Learning the Language
We grow into who
we are. Step by tiny step
into a future laid out
before us like the language
we would grow to speak
and learn to unlearn
and then relearn,
despite our rants
and our raves,
in spite of ourselves.
No. The first raw taste
that sits on the tongue
like beets. Too red, too
root-filled to ignore.
No again. This time
the unsavory bits of chopped
spinach, a green we swallow
in reluctance. We have not yet
learned the loveliness of
green and No, nor the unbridled
joy of sating ourselves
with tuberous things. Things that grow
underground in the dark, wet
places we are yet to know.
And then, one day, a normal
day in most every aspect
of the word normal, all of our oral
expectations are met, and it’s
a resounding yes! as mother
pokes the spoon in. An unspoken,
understood yes! that fills the room.
Yes, I will eat that. And this. And more
than you will ever guess in your long life,
Mother. Eat, masticate, at times
regurgitate. Mess myself up in ways
you never expected, you who followed
the step-by-step.
I have grown into an occasional
bite, shunned an entire meal.
I have learned to love the observed.
A bottle of merlot, a fifth of tequila,
a shot of gin and tonic. These
are the substantial elements
of my existence.
Step by step, I fight my way
through briars no one else sees.
I drop from a pine fifty-feet tall
and come out unscathed. I watch
the slender bend of my ankle
get chewed up in the spokes
of a wheel lost in time.
But man have I grown!
The likes of growth so seldom
seen in all of the animal kingdom.
A regular anomaly of sorts,
my body an organism, my brain
a refugee. My use of language
once again relegated to a simple
Yes, a fitful No.
3 comments:
maggie, i'm so upset with myself: i just spent a good twenty minutes writing a longish (and i thought quite eloquent reply hah) and damn ole blog tosses it away into the ether.
i'll be back with some of it later, when i quit licking my wounds. i like the poem. jim
to continue ...
in a nutshell, it seemed to me you knew exactly where you wanted the poem to go, and shaped it to take you there. my view of things is essentially the opposite, that the poem is born of a collision between spirit and writer, each jockeying for superiority, and both usually losing out to a new form entirely, one that neither anticipated nor necessarily wanted.
and i believe too that erecting a poem is a bit like building a house, in the sense that owner (and family members) keep wanting certain things to happen, and the builder is striving to keep within his budget and maintain the plan they started out with. the house itself, though, the dwelling, lives and breathes to the degree that it can separate itself from both entities and break free, making a statement that is a compromise between the two extremes.
and i do like your poem, but it still seems somewhat imprisoned by the writer.
and believing as i do in the living presence of the poem itself, i think that the ending will invariably surprise and/or astonish us with how it has progressed from its beginnings.
nor will we be able to sum it up very neatly. it's like my next door neighbor: i think i know her very well, but describing her to someone else leaves me grasping for a meaning that eludes me.
jim
and the writer feels imprisoned. Only in setting the writer free will this work. Maybe not even then.
It started, indeed, where I wanted it to, but it got lost in memories that I generally won't allow myself to visit with long enough to continue the building. It got angry a bit in the middle, which is ok, but not in the long run what it needed.
obtuse--too intimate--too inclusive--too full of itself at times to let go.
thanks, james. Will revisit it when I grow some wings.
Post a Comment